【郭萍】“不受拘束儒學”綱要——現代一包養不受拘束訴求的儒學表達

Chinese people express a modern plea in their own ethnic language. In a sentence, the unrestrained call himself has both modernity and ethnicity.

The reason why we say that being unrestricted is a modern aspiration, not simply denying that modern China also has a certain unrestricted concept, but modern unrestricted has the most basic differences between modern unrestricted at most in three aspects: First, unrestricted is a value requirement and has been widely recognized and recognized in modern society. The bulge is something that cannot be compared in all the past times, so that unrestrained has become a basic value tag of modern society; secondly, the “unrestrained” we will use tomorrow is a noun concept, which is the English “liberty” (or “freed<a") used by Japanese to imitate the English "liberty" (or "freedCaiming Quotesom”), and in modern Han classics, “unrestricted” is only a reciprocal word and does not have specific meanings. Third, more fundamentally, the unrestricted nature of what we talk about tomorrow is not only a political philosophy problem, but it is indeed a political philosophy problem, that is, a problem that points to individual unrestricted rights and a series of institutional structures aimed at, which is the most fundamentally divided by the unrestricted concepts in our traditional thinking. For example, Taoism’s unrestrainedness is a natural and leisure that escapes from human ethics, so what Lao Tzu sought is “never interact with each other until old age”, [2], while Zhuangzi yearned for “no place to exist”; [3] Traditional Confucianism is not restricted, especially the Confucianism of the Song and Ming dynasties, which emphasizes the state obtained through self-cultivation and cultivation, and is actually a kind of moral self-discipline that adheres to the family’s ethics and concepts, and even this kind of moral self-disciplineMoral self-discipline is further abstracted into the intrinsic concepts such as the principles of nature and nature, and has an absolute meaning. These are not as closely viewed as modern unrestrained.

In contrast, unrestricted as a modern apology means that unrestricted oneself belongs not only to the East, but also to China. As far as modern theory is concerned, it was first proposed by modern Eastern thinkers. This is because modernity is a general and ordinary characteristic of the times, and there is no distinction between Chinese and Western. Naturally, modern self-requires are also a kind of cooperation between Chinese and Western. As we all know, the pronunciation of “New Civilization Movement” [4] in 1915 is exactly the most direct expression of Chinese people’s unrestrained arbitrariness. In this case, “neighbor” is to be unrestrained in the human political career, and “science” is to be unrestrained in the natural field. This kind of unrestrained accusation is definitely not the unrestrained proposition at that time, but the value common sense formed by China in the process of modernization. Therefore, we see that not only the unrestrained doctrine, Hu Yi, believes that unrestrained is everyone’s “must be necessary” [5], and Marxist doctrine, also clearly pointed out: “A truly fair socialism, href=”https://twlovelog.com/Diana/%e6%88%91%e7%9a%84%e5%8c%85%e9%a4%8a%e5%b0%8d%e8%b1%a13-%e9%b9%e8%b1%ac%e6%89%8b%e5%b7%a5%e7%a8%8b %e5%b8%ab/”>原文 There is no one who does not care about personal unrestrainedness.”[6] In addition, the modern neo-Confucianism, known as the “civilized and old-fashioned principle”, is no different from the unrestrained principle: Zhang Junxian was busy with human rights, designed a political plan for China, and Xu Xiu’s efforts to create an unrestrained society, and Mou Zongsan advocated the unrestrained principle of Ankang. In other words, being unrestrained is a generalized value request for Chinese people in modern times.

However, each ethnic country has its own uniqueness in unrestrained understanding of methods, slandering, etc. In other words, unrestrained claims need to be complained about a manifestation of ethnicity. Historically, the real unrestrained accusations in the East are very well-behaved because they successfully integrate modern accusations into their own civilization traditions. The most classic is to revive their “two-sweep” traditions through the “cultural rejuvenation”. The so-called “rejuvenation” starts with respecting, recognizing and inheriting its own civilization traditions, and making contemporary notes in the present, rather than simply following the “rejuvenation” as described in the ancient world. Through the “rejuvenation” of tradition, the Oriental’s unrestrained arbitrarily found its own expression of ethnicity, and in theory it is the construction of the Oriental’s unrestrained theories.

The Chinese Euhua School is unrestrained and theories simply set Confucianism and feudal special thinking together, believing that all Confucianism is unrestrained and harmonious. To develop modernity without being restricted, Confucianism must be rejected. Therefore, they carried out a comprehensive anti-tradition through the “anti-Confucian” movement, and finally abandoned the common people’s words. At this day, some scholars still believe that: “Confucianism lacks the natural rights tradition that protects individual rights and is not subject to collective benefits and national rights. Therefore, the Confucian p